Read me the article

Klaus Schwab's greatest fears are coming true


"Man can be destroyed, but not defeated." Ernest Hemingway



There is a global redistribution of property in the world, without which it is impossible to create a new arrangement; and capitalism arose by "fencing", when people were expelled from the land, that is, their property was taken away. The same thing is happening now, when coming out of capitalism: in order to create a post-capitalist system, a mass of ruined, unhappy people is needed, that is, it is necessary to take away funds from small and medium-sized businesses. Lockdown was used in that way and for that purpose.

Another thing, not so many educated people are needed, it is necessary to complete the process of destroying education, a process that has been evolutionary so far will now make it revolutionary: distance education is being introduced. Furthermore, social distance represents the training of social atomization of people and their constant intimidation. I remember how Merkel and Boris Johnson, at the very beginning, addressed the Germans and the British in a similar way: they said that millions would die; the statesman must strengthen the self-confidence of his citizens, and they immediately began to intimidate the people. The process is getting more complicated, and more than that, we are constantly told that there will be even more terrible epidemics, that is - do not relax.

The most important thing in all this is social measures, which are implemented on a global level in order to create what is called - a new normality. Very interesting, Schwab wrote in his book that everything should be done quickly, in blitzkrieg mode, otherwise the process will fail, people will become aware ..

And secondly, if at least one big country comes out of this process, it will fail. The big countries are the USA, China and Russia, since we still have the Soviet heritage of Stalin and Beria, otherwise no one would talk to our leadership. It is in Russia that, in a paradoxical way, the fate of the world will be decided - either it will succeed in fully realizing its new normalcy or it will stumble and end up in the mud. In the battle of the twenty-first century, the one who falls last will win.

Every new arrangement in the making is, as a rule, a cruel arrangement; therefore, the more resistance there is to this arrangement at all levels, the more this young bully's teeth are knocked out - he will be softer. I think that rescue should be considered in this way.

In 1917 there was a revolution, the USSR was formed. The Soviet Union did not simply destroy Hitler, the USSR slowed down this very process of ultraglobalization that we have now, and that is why they hate Stalin in the West. He thwarted the plans of globalists and postponed his arrival in 1991 for approximately 70 years. If it weren't for that, globalization would have started in the twenties.


The greatest danger in the modern world is not demographic, nor climate, nor energy, as it arises from a number of papers and publications. All this is very important, but the most dangerous thing for the modern world is - social war, social catastrophe organized by the top of the world capitalist system to translate capitalism into a new state - post-capitalism.

This social war is being waged at various levels. It is a war of the top against the lower class, a war of the top against the middle class, a war within the top of different regional groups, clans, different forms of organizations, for example, financiers against industrialists, exists against corporatism. In other words, a social war that is spreading - it is a war, as it is now fashionable to say, transitional, for the transition to a new social system.

This is very similar to what happened in Europe from the middle of the fifteenth to the middle of the seventeenth century, when a new one was created on the skeleton of the previous arrangement. Such a war is the most dangerous. The danger of this war stems from the fact that the main object of appropriation in post-capitalist society will not be materialized factors of production, but spiritual and informational, that is, needs, values, human goals, that is, the object of appropriation becomes - the spiritual sphere. It is not a matter of simple appropriation of the spiritual sphere, but appropriation becomes the main form of production relations, as Marxists would say.

Today's struggle for traditional values, which is developing all over the world, only formally refers to the past - the struggle for tradition against something modern, however, that is the wrong approach. In fact, under the guise of a struggle for traditional values, a fundamentally new social, if you prefer, class struggle in a post-capitalist society is beginning to form.

Some say, "But why oppose, the bourgeoisie is still stronger and they will win." First of all, it is not a fact that he will win. Secondly, it is a shame not to oppose. But, there is one more thing, quite pragmatic, and history shows that this is exactly how everything in life happens. Namely, no new social order wins by knockout, there is always a compromise and the more teeth a young bully erupts by opposing at different levels, the calmer and more humane, if I may say so, will be the new order.


Digitization itself is a neutral technical process, as is the emergence of machine production. The question, however, is who is using it and for what purpose. Based on what we know from Klaus Schwab's books, the performances of all kinds of "grefs" and others, it is perfectly clear - they do not plan to use digitalization for the good of man, but to replace man and build a digital concentration camp. This process needs to be unconditionally opposed, in every possible way.

There is another moment related to digitalization - it is about the emergence of a capitalist system in which intangible, informational factors will play a decisive role. Of course, today's world leaders will make sure to turn digitalization into a process with the help of which they will be able to alienate these factors.

But every technical device has a double-edged blade. It can be the weapon of the master, and it can also be the weapon of the one who does not want to be a serf, slave and so on… That is why it is necessary to master all these methods and use them for their own good, and not allow them to be used as social weapons.

I understand that it is significantly more difficult to do than to say, but there are no other options. Nobody abolished the class struggle, the social struggle. The state in which the world has lived for the last hundred years is the result of the struggle of the lower and middle classes for their rights. That is why it is surprising how people, literally during one year, gave up those rights. They were pressed by fear of the coronavirus… this whole story is a very good social experience. One should not allow one to turn him into an object of information-psychological terror.

But information-psychological terror is a much scarier thing than digitalization, because digitalization is an instrument, and terror is something more serious. He needs to be opposed.


What Klaus Schwab means by the fourth industrial revolution: if the first three industrial revolutions are what we have done with the world, then the fourth is what they are doing with you. The fourth industrial revolution is a change in the human genome, it is a change in man himself; the dreams of transhumanists to turn man into some other being are being realized. That is, the epoch of people ends and the epoch of transhumanist beings begins. It reminds me very much of, you remember the Lord of the Rings, Saruman, and then the leader of the Orcs, Azmog, when they shout: The era of people is over, the time of the Orcs is coming.

So, the fourth industrial revolution is the revolution that should create the Orcs, and it is going in different directions: in the direction of fighting the climate, which is supposedly the result of human activity, although that thing is unproven. But, if it is the result of human activity, then it is necessary to reduce the population. Recently, the work of an Italian activist was published in Italy, in which it is written that the planet is planned for three billion people, the rest are parasites, the population needs to be reduced. That is, the turn towards the climate, the supposed struggle with the climate, is completely clear.

Lockdowns can be introduced not only because of the fight against the virus, but also because of the climate. And if you remember that all the big cities of the third world: Lagos, Lima, New Delhi, Karachi, are under smog, that is, as if God himself said that it should be done there, to destroy small and medium business in the third world . At this moment, everything related to the virus has affected the Post-West, that is, the global North, and small and medium-sized businesses of the global North have suffered. But many businesses in the most developed countries of the South, such as India, Nigeria, as well as the most developed part of Latin America, are now taking them.

That is, nothing has changed, there is indeed a perestroika of the planet, but different variants will be used in different parts of it, and, perhaps, it will loosen the spurs in the North a little. But, in any case, they are not doing well… Schwab expressed three fears in his book: the first fear - that there will be social unrest, social resistance - social resistance exists; the other fear is - tempo, very weak tempo due to sabotage - tempo is low; third fear - if one big country comes out of this process, everything will collapse, and they failed with China, Xi Jinping took over digital platforms for Chinese exists in China. In the USA, Trump was overthrown, but it is not so simple there, that is, the process is not going as the planner wanted, and in this I see a very, very big pledge of even restrained optimism. That is, a young bandit system is emerging and the more we oppose it, the more teeth we erupt in the beginning, the softer it will be. We want that to be the case.


The harshest scenario, the worst scenario is - bio-techno-eco fascism. It's medicine, it's all about climate and technology - it's digitization. I do not use fascism here in the strict sense of the word, but as a metaphor, as an arrangement of absolute suffocation, oppression. But even in the Third Reich, Nazism did not achieve all its goals, because, as Hemingway said, it is possible to destroy a man, but not to defeat him. 6-7 percent of those who are classified by psychology as a modal personality type are enough. I think it will be very difficult to succeed.

In addition, there is a large population outside the global North, that is, the global South. Of course, I can make them fight each other, I can exterminate them, but if you turn your population into a flock of senseless sheep, sooner or later, they will come from the other side of the walls and slaughter the flock. It is no coincidence that the 14th century Arab thinker Ibn Khaldun had a four-stage theory. The first stage - the Bedouins come from the desert and slaughter the fattened top. The second stage - the second generation - are the people who create the empire and consolidate it. The third stage - the empire is consolidated and they are now investing in art and science. The fourth stage - now they are not investing in anything, they are getting fatter, they are not interested in anything, a new generation of Bedouins is coming and slaughtering them. The same process was described by Thomas Mann in the novel Budenbrock, sociologists call it the "law of the Budenbrocks", the law of four generations. Four generations of the family, the same is in business… we see that there are some purely socio-biological laws here.

Thus, a closed system is being created, bio-techno-eco fascism that can survive, with a lot of inconvenience, forty to fifty years, maximum. Because no one has annulled the second law of thermodynamics: closed systems are failing because entropy, that is, the force of collapse, is growing in them. Why is a closed system needed? I look at that same Swabian, I look at people who think from the same positions, and I may be wrong, but I have the impression that they have a terrible fear of life, and of death as a part of life, because death is a part of life. A purely psychological motive is possible, in addition to the social one, that they want to hide from life, that they are scared. By the way, if we read Schwab carefully - that book was written under the influence of a huge social fear, that if what they do fails, the end will come, and we will all fly away.

In the great novel, I think it is the best novel in the last twenty years, Yuri Kozlov's "New Thief", the fear of the Western elite before the changes and their aspirations to create this absolutely controlled world is very well shown. Imagine, you and I control social networks, information, education, we have put everything under control - that is the main factor of production, the intangible. Lockdown is one of the ways to move faster to post-capitalism, it is a way to destroy small and medium-sized businesses. We have a mass of small and medium-sized businesses, people, each of whom has some ownership of the material means of production, and if we take them all together - they balance corporations. In order for these people to become an object of exploitation on the basis of spiritual factors of production, it is necessary to steal materialized means of production from them. By the way, when we look at this relationship - the way out of capitalism is very similar to the way out of capitalism; in the 16th century, a fencing process was carried out in England, people were expelled from the country, and here they are simply robbed of their property. Pay attention to how they say: What do you need a car for, car sharing is good? What do you need your own house, you can rent a house? That is, you should have nothing.

In 2016 or 2012, I may be wrong, the Rockefeller Foundation published a poster like this: a man stands against the backdrop of a beautiful lake, like a Swiss lake, and says: I have nothing, I have no property, I am happy. That is the creation of the new, they must create a layer of people who will be a complete object for exploitation within the framework of the emerging system. There is no name for it yet, in the West they say exism, from the English word access, access, under it they mean existential structures such as Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, that is, those structures that control and manage people's behavior, their needs, because if you dictate man's needs, then you have controlled the sphere of his goals.


The world is too big and complex to be ruled from one center. Although attempts to create such a management system have been made many times and still are today. As for the Bilderberg Club, the Trilateral Commission and similar structures, these are primarily structures for elaborating and harmonizing decisions made by "masters of the world game" (O. Markejev) or "masters of history" (B. Dizarelli) and their secrets, and not just about closed organizations. I have in mind several dozen royal-aristocratic and financial families, many of which, to one degree or another, control each other, control basic global financial flows, the media and the closed, that is, science that serves only "masters of history", natural science, social and technical.

Conspiracy is usually understood as primitive schemes that do not explain historical events by historical laws and main tendencies of development, but by secret, and, as a rule, malicious activity of some forces (choose - Masons, ranks, special services, etc.). Often such schemes are considered frivolous. Indeed, quite a number of works, which are called conspiracy theories, were written by unscrupulous authors in search of sensations and earnings. But at the same time, can anyone dispute the fact that not all the causes and motives of what is happening in the world are visible - on the contrary, they are hidden; far from all the goals being publicly declared - that is not natural. We know very well that high politics is conducted in secret, that the real government - the secret government, the zone of functioning of "high finances" - is also a secret. Therefore, they often try to question the realistic analysis of the hidden mechanisms of history - limited people, or, profane, or, conversely, those who know very well about the existence of secret forces, structures and the like. so they try to divert attention from them, to catch traces by ridiculing serious research as conspiracy theories.

Look, for example, at the Comintern, that is, the Third International, which for two decades secretly planned and carried out coups, uprisings, revolutions, which has huge, secret financial resources and the like. - it is a conspiracy structure, and its influence on the course of history - is it also a form of conspiracy influence? Why are analogous bourgeois structures, which operate in a closed, covert regime, and possess much greater political and financial potential, not conspiratorial? I recall Trotsky's words that today's revolutionaries are sitting on Wall Street.

It is understood that the basis of the crisis and revolution are objective, more precisely - systemic and subjective causes. Nobody stopped the mass processes. But, first, the world is not a quantitative, but a qualitative concept, as Einstein liked to say. In the world, a small but well-organized group, in whose hands - huge resources (property, finances), power and control over knowledge and its structures, as well as the media, has much more weight than the mass of people, or even the whole country - it is enough to read "Confession of an Economic Killer" by J. Perkins. As Nobel Prize-winning conspiracy theorist Paul Krugman noted, "modern political economy teaches us that the interests of a small, well-organized group often outweigh the interests of the general public."

There is nothing unnatural in the activities of closed supranational structures, they are born of the logic of the development of capitalism. In economic terms, capitalism is a system without borders, a world market. And on the political level, the capitalist system is a mosaic of states. But the economic interests of the bourgeoisie go far beyond the borders of one state. That is why the world capitalist class objectively needs supranational, supranational structures, and they must be, if not secret, then at least closed to the general public. In this way, the contradiction between the economic integrity and the political fragmentation of the capitalist system is reduced. Hence the persistent striving of the top world capitalist class to create something like a world government. By the way, Russia has always stood in the way of accomplishing this task; this is one of the reasons for the fiery "love" for her and for us, the Russians, the masters of the capitalist system - the Anglo-Saxons, especially the British.

In order to reduce the basic political and economic contradictions of the capitalist system, supranational structures were needed. However, the bourgeoisie did not have ready organizations of this type. At the beginning of the XNUMXth century, when all power was held by the state and the aristocracy, what was available had to be used. For example, Masonic organizations. During the XNUMXth century, their rapid growth began. Of course, they originated earlier in the XNUMXth and the beginning of the XNUMXth century and represented an evolutionary form of Templar structures, which left France in the XNUMXth century, but real life was inspired by the bourgeois epoch - its demands and interests. At the end of his life, Marx said: if I were to write Capital again today, when capital bows to the past with a deep bow, I would start working on capitalism from closed supranational structures of government: they give the capitalist system a complete and complete character. design and construction nature.

Masons originate from the masonry guilds of the 12th-16th centuries, which built Gothic churches for many centuries and the remains of knightly orders of the 14th-16th centuries, and which originated in the 17th century at the beginning of the New Age and Enlightenment with the cult of God-mechanic. In the 18th century, he turned into the cult of Reason and worshiped the Great Architect, who has the image of the Phoenician king Hiram, who built the first temple in Jerusalem in the time of David. The Hourglass God, who created the Universe as a perfect mechanism, and the Architect God who built the perfect Temple-Universe - are the ideals of the early Modern 17-18 centuries, which still gave birth to the Renaissance and went through the temptations of the Reformation when the Renaissance subject wanted power . "

In the middle of the XNUMXth century, a great evolutionary turning point occurred in Europe: history became predominantly spontaneous and mostly planned and constructed. This does not mean that until the middle of the XNUMXth century, there were no groups and forces that tried, often successfully, to direct its course. However, in the middle of the XNUMXth century, three factors emerged that introduced qualitative changes in the historical process. This is the beginning of the formation of a mass society, the unprecedented strengthening of financial capital and the sudden growth of the role of information flows. Try to manage a municipality, a caste or a polis - structures rooted in tradition that act as a collective social individual. Another thing - a group individual who is easy to manipulate; the emergence of the masses on the stage of history has given the manipulators enormous opportunities. That's the first.

Secondly, the struggle for hegemony in the world capitalist system between Great Britain and France intensified, the military needs of other countries grew, and industrialization began, colossally stimulating the development of financial capital in the 1789th century. the beginning of its emergence - Standard Chartered Bank, Baruch, until the creation, eventually, the English Central Bank). Third. The information boom in the 1848th century, which made it possible to "package" information and use its effects, primarily on elite groups. A classic example is the "Encyclopedia", with which, for several decades, the French elite was morally prepared to accept the revolution. In other words, in the middle of the XNUMXth century, Matter (mass), Energy (money) and Information (ideas) merged. Braided in a tight knot, these substances came under the control of certain groups, which for several decades prepared the situation and human material for the era of revolutions (XNUMX-XNUMX).

However, one should not think that the project-construction epoch of history is always a triumph of constructors-designers. There is also what Hegel called the "cunning of history." For example, the question is whether forces planning to overthrow the autocracy, destroy Russia and use Russia's revolution to break down all barriers to capital could have guessed that Stalin's team and the "support group" of the Imperial General Staff and its intelligence service would break project "world revolutions" and untangle the left (Comintern) and right (Finiterna) globalists, realizing the project "socialism in one, separate country", and renew the empire in the form of a world system of socialism and postpone globalization for almost a hundred years. Conclusion: the construction of history - is a conflict of projects, systems and elites, which the Soviet elite of the Stalinist type won, and the post-war - lost. It lost, because as it integrated into the world market in the mid-XNUMXs, it lost global leadership. From the West, on the contrary, comes the design approach. The Last Great Hunt of Capitalism is largely a project. And everything should be done to not only break it, but turn it against the designers, so that this hunt becomes the last one for them. As Hamlet said: "go poison steel, where you are told."

Today's conflict between elites, Chinese (East Asian) and Western, organized into clubs, lodges, network structures (primarily its Anglo-American core) - is an interesting and unprecedented process. The Western elite met for the first time with an opponent who, although representing a non-Western civilization, appears as a global player; so far only the capitalist West has been global, relying in its expansion on the geoculture of the Enlightenment.

The Western elite is beginning to demonstrate signs of inferiority and even degeneration a la Budenbrock, only instead of four generations we have four centuries here. In other words, in crisis conditions, the game seems to start again. Can the Western elite rebuild itself in accordance with the new conditions, renew and create new forms of (self) organization? New knowledge about the world and man as a psychohistorical weapon? That is one question.

Another question is whether other subjects of strategic action can use the conflicts between the West and China, solving their problems and using - according to the principle of judo - the strength of the opponent.

The development of the conflict between the Western elite, above all its Anglo-Saxon-Jewish core and the Chinese elite - which is an unprecedented phenomenon in the history of world struggle, is an interesting picture and many surprises await us. In many ways, this struggle will determine the future - post-capitalist and in general.







6. REAL POWER IS SECRET POWER–eto-tainaia-vlast-andrei-fursov-619b3be7aa93a74fa8cd7c53?&